HOME

 TESTIMONIALS

CASE STUDIES

E- JOURNAL

E - CLINIC

CLINICS

F.A.Q.'s
EVENTS
PUBLICATIONS

              E - Journal   (Feb -2010)          

For Appointments Call :
91-9246150882,
91-40-27813464,
91-40-40183014

Second Prescription - Scientific Analysis
Dr. Mahesh Tayshete, MD (Hom.)

Year 1796 is considered as year of birth of homeopathy. Homoeopathic medicines gave better results to Hahnemann than Allopathy but still he found something missing. He found that the beginning was excellent, progress was fair and end result was hopeless. This has lead to discovery of two important facts:

1. Presenting symptoms do not form the complete picture;
2. Disappearance of symptoms does not essentially mean cure.
Further studies by homoeopaths of that time provided an answer to the above.

Hahnemann himself found that presenting symptoms do not form the complete picture of the patient, we have add his past history, family history and the fundamental cause or Miasm to obtain a complete picture. He has written my discovery of miasms is bigger and important than the discovery of law of similars. If one wants the final result to be a cure, one has to understand the miasm.

The second point was answered by Dr. Hering. Disappearance of symptoms does not essentially mean cure. For cure this appearance should follow a definite direction. This direction is known as Hering’s Law of Cure.

During embryological growth, more important organ develops first than the less important and finally least important. And this is direction on nutrition gradients. This means that nature itself gives nutrition to most important organ first than the less important and finally least important. And cure also takes place in most important organ first than the less important and finally least important organ or system. It is natural the body saves the most important organ first than the less important and finally least important organ.

Hahnemann has written more than 200 years ago that what ever he says is based on experiments that are based on natural law and he does not have the means to see and understand what is happening inside human body. But the logic deducted by these great scientists of natural laws has stood the test of time only to be confirmed by the tools of scientific study in present day times.

Many patients come to homoeopathy because homoeopathy cures and not suppresses. Dr. Samuel Hahnemann was the first one to talk about suppressions. Any effect of medicine that does not follow Hering’s Law is suppression. Suppressions form the majority of responses that are seen in practice of majority of practitioners.
One of the students of homoeopathic college once asked me Allopathic medicines suppress because of their strong material doses but how can suppression take place by one dose of wrong homoeopathic medicine. The answer is plain and simple if one dose can cure, it can also suppress.

Today I realize that many so called ‘magics’ by many doctors may have been suppressions by single dose.

Our medicines just initiate the reaction in the body allowing body’s own immune system to start healing process. If medicine is incorrect it may lead to the start of suppression process.

E- Journal -FEB- 2010

Editorial By Dr. Dhiraj Nanda, MD (Hom.)

Second Prescription - Scientific Analysis
By Dr. Mahesh Tayshete, MD (Hom.)


18th National Homoeopathic  Conference
By Dr. Anurudh Verma,


Report on Seminar 2010 with Dr. Dhiraj Nanda
Organised HMAI (Nanded Unit) By  Dr. Milind Bhadre Dr. G. Mohan......


Workshop cum Camp on Auto-immune Diseases
On 13/02/2010


Case of the month By - Dr. Dhiraj Nanda MD (Hom.)

Advanced Classical Homoeopathy Clinic, Hyderabad,  All Rights Reserved

Design and maintenance by www.legendraw.com